|
|
|
|
| THIS WEBPAGE BEST VIEWED AT 1680 X 1050 RESOLUTION |

|
|
THE CARTER AVENUE PIPELINE STORY
CLICK HERE FOR THE VIDEO
Carter Avenue runs along a large limestone outcropping known
as Sycamore Heights. Sycamore Creek flows down below and the western ridge offers sweeping views of downtown Fort Worth and amazing sunsets.
|
|
|
Bordered by huge greenspaces - Tandy
Hills Natural Area to the east and Gateway Park to the north - Sycamore Heights retains a unique country ambience for
such close-in urban location.
|

|
| Tandy Hills Natural Area ( Photo by Don Young) |
|
| |
| |
|
This idyllic setting is complicated by Lancaster Avenue
to the south.
|
| |
|
A concentration of homeless shelters
continue to present a serious challenge to the Sycamore Heights neighborhood. Crime-infested motels and a plasma
center that pays cash for blood do not help the situation.
|
| |
| |
|
After decades of neglect, Sycamore Heights and
Carter Avenue finally seemed to be on the verge of a turnaround in the year 2008. The freshly paved streets were lined
with brand new sidewalks and grassy medians.
|
|
|
The residents, a diverse mix of senior citizens, young
families with children, singles, immigrants, gays and military families, began remodeling and landscaping their
homes. Carter Avenue became an example of the quality affordable low-income housing that the City of
Fort Worth says it so desperately needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June of 2008, Carter Avenue residents learned that Texas
Midstream Gas Services (a subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy) needed to connect two wells with a gas gathering pipeline.
TMGS decided that the best place for this pipeline would be under Carter Avenue front yards.
|
|
|
|
The City of Fort Worth and Chesapeake hosted a community
meeting at the Sycamore Community Center on July 14, 2008. Residents got their first look at the intended
route of the pipeline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many residents in Sycamore Heights and throughout the
whole Meadowbrook area were stunned, then upset and fearful about what they learned at that meeting. They asked
Chesapeake why this pipeline couldn't be run along I-30 instead of through their neighborhood.
|
|
|
On 7-30-08, West Meadowbrook Neighborhood Association
responded to community concerns and hosted a special meeting. Chesapeake personnel presented their case and many
residents and other concerned citizens passionately objected to this pipeline.
|
|
|
|

|
| REP MARC VEASY AND COUNCIL MEMBER KATHLEEN HICKS |
|
Council Council Member Kathleen Hicks and TX
State Representatives Marc Veasy and Lon Burnam listened as residents from across the city expressed their strong
concerns about a pipeline below their homes running highly pressurized unprocessed gas that can't be smelled. A
former pipeline executive explained how this type of "wet" gas coming straight off a wellhead can condense and
cause pipe failure in just a three years.
|
|
Over and over, residents questioned the wisdom of running
this type of gasline through our neighborhoods. They wanted answers about property values and home insurance
coverage. A retired chemist explained the dangers of chemical exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
In September, 2008, Texas midstream submitted a City permit application to cross Beach Street.
Before even receiving approval for this permit, TMGS began obtaining 20' easements
through the front yards on the south side of Carter Avenue. The south side of the street contains only residences.
The north side of Carter Avenue includes a commercial parking lot for Chase Bank.
Faced with the prospect of eminent domain, some residents signed easement
agreements. Those who would not sign eventually faced a row full of Chesapeake lawyers in eminent domain court.
Most of their easements were seized with very little financial remuneration. Jerry Horton fought to the bitter end:
CHANNEL 11 TALKS WITH JERRY HORTON
As of March 2009, all residential easements had been obtained except
those lots owned by the City of Fort Worth...and yet
the City Council still had not voted on the permit to cross Beach Street!
Citizens continued to demand an
alternate pipeline route. For months the City
said they were seeking alternatives routes. When asked who in the City was working on this, it was explained
that the City was looking to Chesapeake for these alternatives. However, Chesapeake said they were not researching alternative routes. They had determined what they considered the best route
and were satisfied with it.
After a public information request was filed, the
City released pages of documentation - many duplicate emails and irrelevant information. Residents began to wonder about the the City's committment to "seek
alternatives".
On March 19th, a group of concerned citizens travelled
to Austin and testified before the House Committee on Energy Resources - exposing the ugly facts
about the Carter Avenue pipeline to a much larger audience.
Miraculously (and shortly
after this hearing) Chesapeake appeared to have a change of heart ...
On 3-27-09 (and coincidentally just
before the upcoming citywide Mayoral and City Council elections) Carter Avenue residents opened their mailboxes to find
a letter stating that TMGS was having to "reevaluate" the Thomas to Hickman pipeline due to revisions
in the gas ordinance:
Even though the revised gas ordinance did not require pipeline "reevaluation",
residents were encouraged by Chesapeake's apparent decision to back away from the Carter Avenue pipeline route. However,
some were concerned that this might just another stall tactic to get through the upcoming City elections.
Their concerns were later justified ....
As the Texas legislative session drew to a close in May 2009, TX State
Senator Wendy Davis and TX State Rep Lon Burnam struggled to address the problem of industrial gas pipelines in neighborhoods
like Carter Avenue. Even though Davis' S.B.686 was eventually vetoed by Gov Rick Perry, he did sign H.B.2572 which allows
gas gathering pipelines to run ALONG public right-of-ways, with some considerations.
After
months of silence, Chesapeake hastily called a "community" meeting at Texas Wesleyan on Oct 15, 2009
that was closed to anyone other than those directly in the pipeline path. Chesapeake claims they mailed out notices
to all affected residents but only two Carter Ave residences reported receiving notices - both of which had incorrect
occupant names. When area residents learned of this meeting just a few days before the Oct 15th, they protested
to Chesapeake. On Oct 12th, Chesapeake hastily cancelled and then rescheduled the meeting.
Less than a handful of residents showed up to hear the Cheseapeake presentation on why Carter Avenue was the only
viable route for the Thomas 1H to Hickman pipeline. Many more Carter residents, offended by Chesapeake's
obvious subterfuge, attended a block party that was held that same afternoon. Amidst hotdogs and balloons, they
reconnected and planned strategy to continue this pipeline fight. Click on the following link for more TV coverage: CHANNEL 33 NEWS REPORT
Council Rep Kathleen Hicks agreed that the Oct 15th Chesapeake
meeting did not qualify as a community meeting. A few days later, the City, TXDOT, Chesapeake, TX Senator
Wenday Davis, and TX Rep Lon Burnam met together and it was revealed that Chesapeake never even applied for a permit
to run along I-30. (see Star-Telegram article dated 10-23-9) The City put the street permit vote on hold until they were convinced that Chesapeake fully
explored that northern route.
It now appears that
good progress has been made on the northern route. A community meeting will be held December 2, 2009 at Meadowbrook
Elementary, 4330 Meadowbrook Drive (see Home Page for details). Hicks, Burnam and Davis will be in attendance as
City staff make their presentation and have a question and answer session. Let's keep our fingers crossed and hope that
this pipeline will be kept out of our neighborhood.
There is no way this type of dangerous pipeline
should be allowed to run through ANY neighborhood in ANY part of Fort Worth. Lack of leadership on the City's part should
not condemn Sycamore Heights to future decline and deterioration.
As community awareness increases, support is
growing for protecting our neighborhoods from gas-gathering pipelines. Click on the links below for public statements:
As the first urban gas drilling in the nation takes
place in Fort Worth, residents from all over the city are questioning the wisdom of placing gas gathering pipelines
in neighborhoods. Pipelines of this nature have previously
been run through rural areas with sparse populations. The dangerous gas flowing through these pipelines is odorless,
high pressure, raw "wet" gas with the ability to corrode pipes in a few short years. Pipeline explosions and
accidents happen yearly. As the Barnett Shale play moves into the cities, tough decisions must be made between production
interests and protection of residents. If allowed to go through, Carter Avenue will be the first raw
gas gathering pipeline to be drilled under multiple residential lots along several continuous streets. Communities as far away as Pennsylvania and New York watch as events unfold.
They hope to learn and gain guidance from our experience here in Fort Worth as gas drilling activities
approach their urban areas.
To
learn more about the hazards associated with gas drilling, click here.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:
1) "I thought our community lease took
care of these issues"
The lease negotiated by the
Greater Meadowbrook Minerals Leasing Task Force was with XTO, not Chesapeake. XTO has agreed to respect our neighborhoods
by not drilling within the residential areas. Chesapeake is not bound by that lease agreement.
2) "Why should I be concerned
about this - it's not on my street?"
Everyone in
Meadowbrook (and all of Fort Worth) should be concerned about this Carter Avenue pipeline because it sets an historic precedent.
This is the first urban pipeline of its type to be run along a residential street. Chesapeake owns at least two more
large leases - one on Scenery Hill and one along Brentwood Stair. Residents are concerned that future gas gathering
lines and waste disposal pipelines could be run farther west along the Brentwood Stair corridor as far as Schilling and possibly
further.
If it can be done on Carter Avenue, it can
be done on your street!
3) "Aren't there already gas pipelines running in our streets?"
The residential gas lines that
run to our homes are different from the proposed Carter Avenue pipeline. They are low pressure lines (approximately .5 PSI)
and contain an odorant for easy leak detection. The Carter Avenue pipeline(s) will run at high-pressure (approx
500-800 PSI) and without added odorant, meaning that you cannot easily smell a leak. Also, the gas will be a highly
corrosive, unprocessed "wet" gas coming straight from the wellhead. There have been several recent
accidents where modern pipes have developed leaks in as little as 3 years. The Chesapeake waivers that
were signed by Carter Avenue homeowners indicate that multiple pipelines may be laid down, not just one. How well will
Carter residents to sleep at night knowing that potentially explosive pipeline lies in an easement just a few
feet away from their beds?
4) "I thought that City zoning ordinances
prevent this type of development?"
In the state of Texas, the safety of gas pipelines are regulated by the Railroad Commission however they are
still subject to City ordinances. Some citizens assert that the City of Fort Worth is a "home rule" city
which means we can make our own rules unless expressly forbidden by State law or the State Constitution and
that the City has the power to determine where pipelines run within the city limits. City officials claim they must
be reasonable in the process of refusing street crossing permits or they will be sued by owners/producers who
are unable to get their gas to market. Residents ask the question, "What is not reasonable
about protecting the health and safety of Fort Worth citizens?". There is another route for this pipeline - under
I-30 and along the northside of the highway.
5) "Why can't they run it along I-30?"
Recent meetings between the City and TXDOT reveal that Chesapeake never
even filed for a permit to run this pipeline along the highway. TXDOT says they have no objection to this
pipeline. Chesapeake has agreed to look again at a northern route along the north side of I-30 and to
the west. HB2572 allows for gas gathering pipelines to run ALONG public right-of-ways, with some considerations.
It is entirely possible to run this pipeline along the northside of I-30 close to the already existing large Energy Transfer
pipeline.
6) "Why can't they run it north across I-30?"
The Trinity River Vision project is calling for the removal or rerouting of several
pipelines along the Trinity in the area of the development Only super deep pipelines will be allowed to remain. Chesapeake
has already done one such deep bore across the river for the Hickman/Bayman wells. Apparently they are
not willing to do this again for the Thomas 1H well. They would rather just run this pipeline underneath homes
along city streets. It's the cheapest and easiest way for them to go. However, in the "community"
meeting held on Oct 15, 2009, Chesapeake indicated they would be running the proposed Carter Avenue pipeline between 70' -
120' below the surface. One has to ask then, if Chesapeake is going to do a super deep bore anyway, then why not run
it to the north, underneath I-30 and Gateway Park to connect at the Bayman unit north of the park?
7) "I signed a mineral lease and don't feel right about fighting the
pipeline"
Just because you signed a mineral lease, that does
not give the gas company the authority to put your family at risk. There usually are setbacks from 300' to 600' from
public buildings. Why should a home be subjected to a setback of only 10'?
|